Edward Cherlin | Columbus, IN | March 05, 2017
Oh, wow. I didn't realize that Roland has a real-world Twitter account, @realRBHJr, until just now. I particularly liked the one about the Chinese hoax that is causing cherry blossoms to come out three weeks early in the DC area (due in actual fact to warmer climate).
Bruce Bendix | Saginaw, MI | March 05, 2017
First Trump accused Democrats of attacking him to cover up for Secretary Clinton's loss to him in the Electoral College, now he's accusing President Obama and his administration of leaving intel behind in Russia on him, and wire-tapping Trump Tower during the campaign. There will be no shortage of material for GBT while The Donald is in the White House. I look forward to Trudeau's take on Steve Bannon.
Hauksdottir | Oakland, CA | March 05, 2017
Ooooh, subtle! Roland tweeting about 'Falafel Boy' while in the shower is neatly done. (Chuckle.)
Melinda W. Capozza | Augusta, GA | March 05, 2017
Last Sunday's strip was definitely LOL. Today's strip just brought an "Oh my." Go for it, GBT.
Steve Singer | Iowa City, IA | March 05, 2017
Wait! Roland Berton Hedley, Jr., has someone he sleeps with? Or at least shares a bed with, while tweeting out his gratitude for the latest news cycle? It's about time something truly good happened to Roland, given all the thankless gigs he's accepted over the years, from Vietnam to FoxNews, et al.
Roger Webb | Little Rock, AR | March 01, 2017
President-for-life Bmzklfrpz was never one of my favorite minor characters. In previous storylines I assumed he was used to convey the depths of Duke's and some PR firms' depravity. It seems now, however, that his time has come. He will fit right in with our new administration.
THE MOST REAL
John Ghalt | Anchorage, AK | February 28, 2017
For my money, GBT has always been the most real, and the most relevant, when he walks us through the lives of the long-graduated (and dropped out) Yalies (uhh, Waldenites?). The 1988 reunion has highlighted the wisdom and sensibilities of Trudeau -- at that time within spittin' distance of forty. No doubt Zonker is right to say that Boopsie has matured to become more appealing than she was as a "college woman." Twenty years has not added any rose-colored fondness for him and B.D. A new suit certainly does not "make" him anything other than the same old fun-loving, let-it-hang-out "hippie" (though a haircut and shave might render him un-recognizable). And Mike confesses marital doldrums to the Rev -- all leading up to Nicole as a "dramatic turn-of-events." It's Shakespearean rom-com 400 years later, one strip at a time.
Yeti | Above Howardsville, CO | February 26, 2017
No bog is too slimy for Uncle Duke -- the Iran hostage compound where he played soccer with his guards, the Caribbean where he ran a leisure med school, DC where he represents fallen despots, etc. He is a man who can take lemonade and turn it into toxic waste. New lows await him in the Trump White House.
David Hallett | St. John's, CANADA | February 26, 2017
I'm on my fourth reading of the complete Doonesbury archives. It never gets older ... just wiser.
David Patterson | Boulder, CO | February 26, 2017
As a brilliant and cogent observer of America, and of humanity, you have few parallels. You are the Bob Dylan of comics, at least.
Gideon Wraigh | US of A | February 23, 2017
I started reading Doonesbury as a kid in the mid 1980s, and have recently had the notion to go back and read your work through from the beginning. However, you seem to have at least 50 books, so what is the order I should follow to read your work clear through chronologically? Thanks for the assist.
A comprehensive answer to this question is provided in an FAQ which was first posted on September 11, 2011, and has been updated since. It appears on page six of our FAQ archive (the seventh entry from the top), and you will be placed in proximity to it via this link.
Karen | Alberta, CANADA | February 22, 2017
I'll have what she's having...
For a plethora of Gudetama toons, with subtitles, look here.
Glenn Gordon | Racine, WI | February 20, 2017
In the 25-years-ago-today Flashback strip: "I don't like this negative 'America First' thing that's being put out there by that negative crowd that we're seeing." Holy s***!
Grant H. | Hamilton, CANADA | February 20, 2017
I am fine with "Oh God" being used. I think I have heard other people say it in everyday converse, even atheists. I first read the BLOWBACK comment as objecting to using "Oh God" as a causal explanation. I would object to this. Our present mess shouldn't be blamed on any of the many gods humanity has created.
Sherry O'Sullivan | B.C., CANADA | February 20, 2017
Considering that Sunday's strip artfully shows the deleterious effect Hair Drumpf's abysmal literacy and critical thinking skills are having on the upcoming generation, I thought "Oh God" was more like a cry for help. I know I say it over and over every time I tune in to the news.
R.E. | Moorhead, MN | February 20, 2017
I appreciate Doonesbury's consistently high production quality. I object to including "Oh, God" as a casual exclamation.
Edwin Cherlin | Columbus, IN | February 17, 2017
I first became aware of Lyndon Larouche when I happened on a copy of his "Children of Satan" tract, still available at the Internet Archive. Larouche and his associates claimed that several military officers were Satanists, and Dick Cheney was doing their bidding by trying to start a nuclear war with Iran. Alternative facts are nothing new in America.
M. Harris | Lascassas, TN | February 16, 2017
The Flashbacks page revisits the first appearance of Phred, 45 years ago today. Welcome back!
Thomas L. Olsen | El Paso, TX | February 16, 2017
Former Ambassador Duke should have a job in the Trump Administration. Ethics Czar might be appropriate. Or special assistant to Steve Bannon.
WAYS OF SEEING
George S. | Tequesta, FL | February 14, 2017
Today's video, John Berger's "Ways of Seeing," is a fascinating view of how we interpret the world around us. I wonder what his opinion would be of the internet, the iPhone, the portable computer screen -- not to mention visual "special effects" -- on the impact to society's visualization of the world around us. All images, real or distorted, are available to all, their interpretation left open to the viewer.