A clean, well-lit place to vent

Please feel free to contribute to this frequently-updated forum, which posts selected commentary on our favorite comic strip. If you'd like your critique to be posted, please note that civility, if not approbation, counts. Click here to submit a comment.


    John Ghalt | Anchorage, AK | March 04, 2019

    With Sunday's strip and recent classics, we get a non-topical two-fer. The Boopsie/B.D. reprise trots out many of the usual tropes regarding grownup couples (okay - the Warren Beatty crack was "topical"). The latest Doonesbury grandchild exaggerates precocity to a new multi-syllabic, multi-word level (and okay - "wall" is topical, too). 


    Steve Miracle | Wadsworth, OH | March 04, 2019

    Try as you might, the Boopsie/B.D. relationship will never reach the soap opera heights Luke and Laura attained. 


    Maureen | Beaver, UT | March 03, 2019

    Rosie, you rock! Today's strip takes me right back to Ellie announcing "It's a baby woman!"


    Margaret Delgatty | Vancouver, CANADA | March 03, 2019

    Go, Rosie! Happy to make your acquaintance. I can see you're going to be special...!


    Bob Faser | Tasmania, AUSTRALIA | February 27, 2019

    I wonder if I am the only reader who sees echoes of formulaic "made-for-TV" movies in this week's Classic strips, in which the ham-fisted B.D. and the long-suffering Boopsie seek to get their relationship back on track.


    Rich DuBreuil Col., Army (Ret) | Fayetteville, GA | February 25, 2019

    I am disappointed in your strip this past Sunday where you indicated that a veteran would be willing to kill a member of Congress. This is highly immoral and does not represent the values of our servicemen and women. I have enjoyed your strip for many years but I think you hit the wrong note on this one.

    Editor's Note:

    Mel's obviously just kidding; in fact she says so -- "JK." As regular readers know she was a highly competent NCO, and has had an attitude problem ever since she was subjected to command rape ten years ago. 


    Patty H. | Rome, NY | February 24, 2019

    Oh, oh oh! Can I be the first to say, Go Melissa! I know I'm not the only reader who wishes she was really in Washington making a difference.


    Maryhelen Posey | Calgary, CANADA | February 23, 2019

    Back in the day when I scraped for food, cadging cigarettes was the only source!


    Julia Archer | Adelaide, SOUTH AUSTRALIA | February 22, 2019

    I am so relieved for Mike that although he could only afford to give his daughter a stolen box of paperclips for Christmas, he can still afford to smoke. Things haven't changed much in the years since the strip was first published.


    Margaret Delgatty | Vancouver, CANADA | February 21, 2019

    So wonderful how Doonesbury helps me keep on top of things, even if it took me ten minutes to figure out the derivation of "Juuly"...


    John Ghalt | Anchorage, AK | February 19, 2019

    As a new icon in the Doonesbury world, "Juuly" joins Buttsy, who has been around for 30-odd years as a penetrating critique of Big Tobacco and cigarette marketing. Juuly, at first shot, has a different focus. Although GBT gives a nod to the "Big Cig buyout," he also perpetuates the "addiction model" as representative of the "vape kids." Odd, perhaps, since roughly 30% of all who first try cigarettes, become dependent ("hooked") which leaves the remaining 70% as somehow not representative. It's likely that a popular view of vaping has a similar pattern -- where the behavior of the minority dominates the narrative. Side note: could it be coincidental that in today's 1992 Classic strip Mike shows up to his job-seekers-support-group in a bathrobe, unshaven, holding a cuppa joe and (wait for it) a burning coffin nail?


    Melinda Carpozza | Huntington, IN | February 16, 2019

    I remember when my rather moderate daily newspaper, the Journal Gazette of Ft.Wayne, Indiana, put Doonesbury on the editorial page. Considering GBT's ability to puncture ideological balloons, no matter the political stance of whatever person -- well, I thought the strip belonged on that page anyhow. Bear in mind that Indiana was very red regarding the elections of 2016 and 2018. I tend to be more moderate in my beliefs, and voting; while wearing a purple shirt.


    John Brennand | Maple Ridge, CANADA | February 11, 2019

    Reading the recent comments on the Classic strips, I thought I’d share my two cents. Newer readers may not be aware but, at various times, Doonesbury has been considered so controversial that certain newspaper editors have chosen to banish it from the pages of their papers. Because of this even someone like me, a reader for more years than I care to admit (40), is seeing some of the older strips for the first time. Another odd choice made by some papers was to move the strip from the comics page to the editorial page. Who’da thunk it?

    Editor's Note:

    Many of Doonesbury's most controversial episodes are chronicled in our TIMELINE feature.


    Jahn Ghalt | Anchorage, AK | February 11, 2019

    GBT, generally at his best when "non-topical," hit a home run with today's Zonker flashback (as perpetual adolescent). It is interesting, however, that Zonker has lately taken a redemptive, entrepreneurial road as a Colorado cannabis producer.


    Claus | Styria, AUSTRIA | February 06, 2019

    Even more thanks for filling in non-existing memories for me: In 1986, I moved to a country that (gasp) does not have a single newspaper that runs the daily Doonesbury strip. So the Classic strips running now are all new to me! 


    Bob Faser | Hobart, TASMANIA | February 01, 2019

    The Classic strips from the early '90s open up some new ground on my understanding of the Doonesbury universe. While I remember the older material well, I didn't remember B.D.'s shipboard fling, Mike's recognition as a "Point o' Lite," J.J.'s career as an NYC cabbie, or (most recently) Duke's decision to conduct a "hillbilly stocktake" of his business. Thanks for the memories (even those I can't really recall).


    Allie | Gettysburg, PA | January 27, 2019

    I can't stand vocal fry; to me it sounds like a parody of '80s era "Valley Girls," and they were semi-mythical to begin with. I won't let style override content though, and with apologies to Mike, this daily NPR fan doesn't hear it enough to go crazy and shut down one of the few sane sources of talk on the radio today.

    PS: I hope the dailies will one day return. I feel like Alex's kids are growing up without us!


    Nikki Longaker | Binghamton, NY | January 27, 2019

    Re: Modern language and excess. I used to encourage people to express feelings; now I wish they'd stuff them -- especially the superficial ones. When we experience things that can actually break our hearts, give us joy or lead to awe, there are no longer effective words for them. Everything is Amazing! Every goal is a journey; every pursuit a passion. Every kitten or act of kindness draws tears. I think this started before Trump's claims of the biggest crowd you've ever seen, the best deal in the history of the world, etc., but I'm guessing there's a link in this Age of Excess. Bears investigating, for sure.


    Wayne Franklin | Winston-Salem, NC | January 27, 2019

    So, yeah, I mean, my wife and myself hope the folks at NPR (and so many other outlets) have read today's edition of Doonesbury. Modern language, SAD.


    Brian Harvey | Berkeley, CA | January 27, 2019

    I had to look "vocal fry" up. I guess it's been too long since I taught high school! It's a good thing there's YouTube, because the written explanations don't help. Back in the day, I loved some of the non-political Doonesbury strips, no matter how bad things got in the real political world. I'll never forget baby Kim's first words, "Big Mac!" One of the lesser disasters of the past two years is that I now resent GBT "wasting" a rare Sunday offering on something that isn't, you know, the shutdown, or Stone's history of dirty tricks.